The Defenders of a Bad Scientific Outcome

OK, I get it. Finally. I was wondering why the bad science members defend modern conventional medicine with such vigor. And why they minimize serious side effects including death and a very high rate of iatrogenic disease.

I even see that for every barrage of news reporting some deficiency or dangerous discovery about the effect of some conventional medication(s) THEY do the damage control. Why is that?

Here’s one of the reasons: if you actually admitted that the problems with modern medicine are on such massive proportions as they appear to be then you would have to admit that the scientific methodology that underpins it is also seriously FLAWED.

With recalls of medications on such massive scales it appears to the more pragmatic amongst us that the double blind placebo controlled trial is NOT a good predictor of efficacy nor safety.

Vioxx

Sinusitis

Cough

and so much more!