Freetochoosehealth’s Weblog

Homeopathy, Alternative Medicine, Freedom of Choice in Health Care, Science Homeopathy

Saving Homeopathy from Bad Science and Bad People

Blogs, blogs and more closed system science writers are attacking homeopathy and Societies that are promoting and safeguarding it. They are attempting to make homeopaths into something other than the well intentioned compassionate and sensitive individuals that they are.Why all this attack from blogs and bad science writers?

1. These individuals are ambitious and see this as a way to climb to the top of the skeptic heap or the bad science heap.

2. Many are addicted to prescription drugs especially narcotics and irrationally fear homeopathy will dry up their supply.

3. Many of the organizations attacking homeopathy are funded by pharmaceutical companies.

4. They like to show off their knowledge and skepticism while claiming to have a knowledge of medical science they usually exhibit a profound lack of knowledge and low intellect.

5. Bullying- they see homeopaths as an easy target.

In the late autumn, the medical journal Lancet attacks homeopathy. Why?

This is typically the time for re-subscribing. Lancet managed to get into the world press with their attack on homeopathy the first time and keeps re-trying the strategy. This strategy gets those re-subscriptions.Lancet even used a study or meta-analysis that was rejected by the Swiss government’s group of medical researchers and statisticians and is now being criticized as one of the worst and most biased meta-analysis ever published by a biomedical journal.

Reid Elsevier, their publisher, is the largest medical publisher in the world. They are attempting to get ALL medical publishing under their control and Lancet’s success is an important piece in all this.

Protect your right to choose your health care especially one that has no dangerous side effects like pharmaceutically driven medicine today! Support homeopathy!

November 22, 2007 - Posted by freetochoosehealth | Attacks on your freedom to choose healthcare | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

1 Comment »

  1. Interesting.

    Your opening five bullet points are especially interesting. While numbers 1, 4 and 5 are obviously purely your opinion (and opinions you are obviously quite entitled to hold), numbers 2 and 3 are presented as statements of fact. Do you have any evidence to back up these claims?

    Regards,

    Rich.

    Comment by Rich Scopie | November 29, 2007 | Reply


Leave a comment